Landscape Architects for Industrial Projects: Designing Beyond the Code Minimum
Industrial developers rarely lose sleep over landscaping. When a project is a 300,000-square-foot distribution warehouse, a hyperscale data center campus, or a cold storage facility with forty dock doors, the planting plan usually shows up late in the design process as a line item that has to get signed off before the site plan can move to permit. The default posture is minimum compliance: plant the required tree count, hit the required buffer width, satisfy the parking lot shading formula, and move on.
That posture is understandable given how industrial budgets are allocated. But landscape architects for industrial projects do more than produce a planting plan that survives jurisdictional review. They control site elements developers actually care about long after certificate of occupancy: screening for equipment that municipalities require but nobody wants facing the public right-of-way, buffer plantings that keep truck courts from generating a nuisance complaint from an adjacent business park, and an irrigation system engineered well enough that it doesn’t become a facilities-management headache three summers from now. On a use type where nearly all of the site is building, paving, and vehicle circulation, the landscape scope is small in square footage and outsized in the number of things that can go wrong if it’s treated as an afterthought.
Since founding Evergreen Design Group in 2005, our team has produced planting and irrigation plans for warehouse, distribution, cold storage, self-storage, and data center projects across our licensed markets, typically as a subconsultant to civil engineers, architects, and design-build contractors rather than as the project lead. That vantage point has shown us where industrial landscape design consistently earns or loses its value: at the intersection of code compliance, plant selection, and irrigation engineering.
Why Landscape Architects for Industrial Projects Matter Beyond the Compliance Checkbox
Most jurisdictions require a licensed landscape architect’s stamp on the planting plan for any commercial or industrial site plan submittal, and for good reason. Industrial parcels typically carry their own layer of landscape ordinance requirements: minimum tree ratios along parking areas, buffer widths where the site adjoins another zoning district, and screening standards for loading docks, refuse enclosures, and rooftop or ground-mounted mechanical equipment.
Screening and buffer standards for industrial sites are fairly consistent from one jurisdiction to the next in their intent, even when the specific numbers differ. Typical requirements include a 6- to 10-foot landscape buffer paired with a 6- to 8-foot opacity screen made up of a wall or evergreen plantings, and heavy industrial uses located near residential zones often face buffers of 100 feet or more with substantial screening. Municipal codes also commonly require that loading docks, truck berths, refuse handling areas, and ground-level mechanical equipment be screened wherever they’re visible from a public right-of-way, and many ordinances extend that requirement to service structures over roughly 30 feet high, meaning rooftop equipment can trigger its own screening obligation depending on the jurisdiction.
An underdesigned planting plan gets these numbers technically right and still creates two downstream problems. The first shows up at plan review: reviewers who process industrial submittals every week recognize a plan assembled purely to hit minimums, and borderline compliance is exactly what generates review comments and resubmittal cycles. The second problem shows up after the certificate of occupancy. Screening material chosen without regard for mature size, growth rate, or maintenance access ends up thin, dead, or removed within a few years, and code enforcement doesn’t care why the screening failed, only that it no longer meets the requirement.
That’s the practical case for bringing a landscape architect into an industrial project early rather than treating the planting plan as a permit formality. The same code-required tree count and buffer width can either barely clear review, or actively solve problems the developer already has: equipment noise, glare, dust, security sightlines, and pavement heat
The Industrial Project Types We Design For, and What Each One Actually Needs
“Industrial” covers several distinct building types, and each one drives a different landscape and irrigation program.
Data Centers
Security and equipment screening dominate the program on a data center site. Generator yards, chiller plants, and cooling equipment need screening that satisfies the jurisdiction without opening gaps in the site’s security perimeter. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles generally call for lower shrub massing near fences and camera lines, with taller canopy set further back, which sometimes runs counter to a reviewer’s instinct to simply add more plant material at the buffer. Because these sites often run with minimal on-site staff, the planting palette leans toward low-maintenance, regionally adapted species that don’t generate frequent pruning or replacement calls. For developers building out a multi-site data center program, irrigation zoning also needs to be simple enough for a remote facilities team to manage through a smart controller, which is the kind of standardization our program management services are built around.
Warehouse and Distribution Centers
The truck court and the parking field define this building type, and both drive landscape requirements. Parking lot shading formulas, typically expressed as a tree per fixed number of stalls, or a percentage of paved area under canopy at maturity, apply at full scale here because these sites often carry hundreds of employee and trailer parking spaces. Loading dock and trailer storage areas usually need street-facing screening, and stormwater detention basins, common on large-footprint distribution sites, need a planting approach that tolerates periodic inundation without looking like an afterthought retention pond.
Cold Storage Facilities
Refrigeration equipment adds a constraint most other industrial types don’t have. Condenser units and refrigeration package units require clear airflow, so planting can’t crowd equipment pads even where a screening requirement technically applies to that area. Designing for cold storage means satisfying code from the public-facing sides of the site while keeping manufacturer-specified clearances open around heat rejection equipment, usually by shifting screening plant material a few feet further from the equipment pad than the buffer minimum would otherwise require, and by specifying taller, narrower plant forms instead of wide-spreading shrubs.
Self-Storage Facilities
Self-storage is the outlier in this group because it’s the one industrial-adjacent use with regular walk-in customers, which makes curb appeal a leasing variable and not just a compliance one. The office and entry drive typically get an enhanced planting palette, while the long, low-traffic drive aisles between unit buildings are designed around minimum-maintenance groundcover and turf alternatives, since most self-storage operators run lean landscape maintenance budgets across a portfolio of unstaffed or lightly staffed sites.
Code Compliance Is the Floor, Not the Ceiling
A planting plan that satisfies a jurisdiction’s ordinance and a planting plan that solves the developer’s actual site problems can use the identical tree count, shrub count, and buffer width. What separates them is placement and species selection.
Evergreen versus deciduous species selection determines whether a screen works twelve months a year or only during the growing season. A buffer required to screen a generator yard from an adjacent office park loses most of its function every winter if it’s planted entirely in deciduous material. Columnar or fastigiate tree forms let a narrow bufferyard hit an opacity requirement without pushing root systems and canopy spread into a drive aisle or utility easement. Parking lot shade trees have to be sized and spaced to meet the jurisdiction’s shading formula at a defined number of years after installation, not on the day they’re planted, so species selection has to account for growth rate as much as mature size.
Placement decisions matter just as much as species selection. A tree planted against the reflected heat and wind funneling off a 40-foot metal building wall faces a different microclimate than the same species planted at a shaded, wind-protected corner of the same site, and a plan that ignores that difference produces uneven establishment and higher warranty replacement rates. None of this shows up as a line item on a code compliance checklist, but it’s the difference between a screening buffer that still functions in year eight and one that has to be re-planted at the developer’s expense.
Coordination with the civil grading and drainage plan matters here too. Root zones need to be checked against underground utility routing, storm drain laterals, and dry utility trenching before a planting plan is finalized, and on multi-phase distribution or data center campuses, the plan has to account for what’s installed in phase one versus what waits for a later phase, so early screening doesn’t get torn out when the next phase of grading starts.
Irrigation Design as a Water-Conservation and Risk-Management Tool
Irrigation on industrial sites gets treated as a commodity scope item more often than any other part of the landscape package, which is a mistake given how much irrigated area a typical warehouse, data center, or self-storage site carries once parking lot islands, perimeter buffers, and detention basin slopes are added up.
Hydrozoning, grouping plant material into irrigation zones based on water need rather than location alone, is the foundation of an efficient system. A buffer planted in drought-tolerant, regionally adapted species and a parking lot island planted in ornamental turf shouldn’t run on the same zone or schedule, and mixing them is one of the most common sources of overwatering on commercial sites. Weather-based and soil-moisture-based smart controllers, the technology behind the EPA WaterSense label, correct for this automatically once zones are set up correctly. Experts estimate that as much as half of landscape irrigation water is wasted due to overwatering caused by inefficiencies in irrigation methods and systems, which is where a properly engineered system starts to pay for itself.
The scale matters for industrial sites specifically. Case studies on commercial landscapes have found average water savings of around 30 percent from advanced irrigation controllers, and one documented case at a roughly 370,000-square-foot commercial office complex in Texas found a 40 percent reduction in irrigation water use in its first year, saving more than 12 million gallons of water and roughly $47,000, with a payback period of about a year and a half. A large-footprint industrial site carries a comparable irrigated area once buffers, parking lot landscaping, and detention basin plantings are totaled, so the same efficiency gains, and the same payback logic, apply directly to warehouse and distribution projects of similar scale.
There’s a risk-management dimension here too, specific to how industrial assets get operated. Most industrial properties run with lean on-site staff, and many, particularly data centers and self-storage facilities, have no dedicated grounds crew at all. An irrigation system engineered around correct hydrozoning and a smart controller can run largely unattended and still keep screening plants alive. An irrigation system designed as an afterthought, with zones that don’t match plant water needs, tends to either overwater, driving up utility costs and stressing plant material through root rot and fungal issues, or underwater, killing the screening plantings a code inspector checks for at renewal or during a complaint-driven review. Either failure mode becomes the property manager’s problem long after the design team has moved on. According to ASLA, water-efficient irrigation is most effective when it’s part of an integrated site design from the start, not a fixture spec added at the end, which is exactly why irrigation deserves the same engineering attention as the planting plan itself.
Simple zoning built for remote facilities management via smart controller
Warehouse / Distribution
Parking lot shading and truck court buffers
Fast-establishing shade trees sized to meet shading formula at maturity
High-volume zones (parking islands, detention basins) sized for peak efficiency
Cold Storage
Screening without obstructing refrigeration equipment
Narrow, upright forms set back from condenser and equipment clearances
Zones kept clear of equipment pads; drip preferred near hardscape edges
Self-Storage
Curb appeal at entry/office; low maintenance elsewhere
Enhanced ornamental palette at entry; turf alternatives along drive aisles
Split zoning between enhanced entry areas and low-water drive aisle plantings
For asset managers and CFOs evaluating the timing of an AB 1572 retrofit program, the financial calculus favors early action over deadline-driven compression — for several reasons.
Most jurisdictions require a licensed landscape architect’s stamp for the planting plan on any industrial site plan submittal, so the licensure question is usually settled by code before the design question comes up. Beyond the stamp requirement, a landscape architect coordinates the planting plan with civil grading, drainage, and utility routing, which reduces the review comments and resubmittal cycles that come with plans assembled without that coordination.
It’s a small percentage of total project cost on most industrial sites, usually well under what’s spent on retail or multifamily landscape packages, since most of the parcel is building, paving, and vehicle circulation rather than planted area. That’s exactly why the decisions within that smaller scope carry more weight: there’s less room to absorb a screening buffer that fails or an irrigation system that overwaters, because there’s less landscape area to begin with.
Yes, and it’s one of the more common coordination issues on cold storage and data center sites. Refrigeration condensers, chillers, and backup generators require manufacturer-specified airflow clearances, and a screening buffer planted at the ordinance minimum distance can crowd that equipment. The usual fix is shifting plant material further from the equipment pad than the buffer minimum requires and specifying narrower, upright plant forms instead of wide-spreading shrubs.
A code-compliant, or “permit,” planting plan is engineered to satisfy the jurisdiction’s minimum tree ratios, buffer widths, and screening opacity requirements and nothing more. An enhanced plan starts from that same compliance baseline but layers in species and placement decisions that address the developer’s actual site conditions, including equipment noise, glare, pavement heat, security sightlines, and leasing curb appeal, often using the same or a comparable plant count and budget.
Irrigation zones that don’t match plant water needs tend to run in one of two costly directions: overwatering, which raises utility bills and stresses plant material, or underwatering, which kills the screening and buffer plantings a code inspector checks for during a complaint-driven review or permit renewal. A properly hydrozoned system with a smart controller avoids both failure modes and is built to run without a dedicated on-site grounds crew, which matters given how leanly most industrial properties are staffed.
Yes, and on industrial projects that coordination has to happen early. Grading, drainage, detention basin design, and utility routing all interact directly with where plant material and irrigation lines can go, so the planting and irrigation plans need to be developed alongside the civil package rather than dropped in after grading is finalized.
Partner with a Landscape Architecture Team That Understands Industrial Development
Evergreen Design Group has designed planting and irrigation plans for data center, warehouse, distribution, cold storage, and self-storage projects since 2005, working in-house and as a subconsultant to civil engineers, architects, and design-build contractors licensed in more than 40 states. If you’re scoping an industrial project and want a planting and irrigation package built for jurisdictional review and long-term operational performance, connect with our team to talk through your site.
Evergreen Design Group, a landscape architectural firm, was formed in 2005 by Rodney McNabb. After serving seven years in the U.S. Marine Corps, Rodney entered the landscape contracting business in 1992. Beginning his career as a landscape chemical applicator, Rodney’s employer quickly realized that Rodney was in the wrong position when he kept unintentionally killing all the grass he was spraying for weeds. While this was a commercial landscape maintenance business, Rodney was quickly re-routed to fill the company’s first sales and estimator position for landscape construction projects. This is where Rodney began to excel. After a few short years, he was promoted to oversee the operations of the different branch offices of this company. He even went to work for another firm where he was a regional manager overseeing multiple offices in multiple states that focused on the exterior and interior landscape maintenance of shopping malls. Rodney eventually formed his full-service landscape company – focusing on design, installation, and maintenance. While enjoying the contractor world, he enjoyed the design side more and created Evergreen Design Group to focus strictly on landscape design and consulting. Evergreen Design Group grew quickly and efficiently. The firm now employs approximately 15 landscape architects, landscape designers, and irrigation designers – and focuses on projects all over the U.S. View all posts by Rodney McNabb
Landscape Architects for Industrial Projects: Designing Beyond the Code Minimum
Industrial developers rarely lose sleep over landscaping. When a project is a 300,000-square-foot distribution warehouse, a hyperscale data center campus, or a cold storage facility with forty dock doors, the planting plan usually shows up late in the design process as a line item that has to get signed off before the site plan can move to permit. The default posture is minimum compliance: plant the required tree count, hit the required buffer width, satisfy the parking lot shading formula, and move on.
That posture is understandable given how industrial budgets are allocated. But landscape architects for industrial projects do more than produce a planting plan that survives jurisdictional review. They control site elements developers actually care about long after certificate of occupancy: screening for equipment that municipalities require but nobody wants facing the public right-of-way, buffer plantings that keep truck courts from generating a nuisance complaint from an adjacent business park, and an irrigation system engineered well enough that it doesn’t become a facilities-management headache three summers from now. On a use type where nearly all of the site is building, paving, and vehicle circulation, the landscape scope is small in square footage and outsized in the number of things that can go wrong if it’s treated as an afterthought.
Since founding Evergreen Design Group in 2005, our team has produced planting and irrigation plans for warehouse, distribution, cold storage, self-storage, and data center projects across our licensed markets, typically as a subconsultant to civil engineers, architects, and design-build contractors rather than as the project lead. That vantage point has shown us where industrial landscape design consistently earns or loses its value: at the intersection of code compliance, plant selection, and irrigation engineering.
Why Landscape Architects for Industrial Projects Matter Beyond the Compliance Checkbox
Most jurisdictions require a licensed landscape architect’s stamp on the planting plan for any commercial or industrial site plan submittal, and for good reason. Industrial parcels typically carry their own layer of landscape ordinance requirements: minimum tree ratios along parking areas, buffer widths where the site adjoins another zoning district, and screening standards for loading docks, refuse enclosures, and rooftop or ground-mounted mechanical equipment.
Screening and buffer standards for industrial sites are fairly consistent from one jurisdiction to the next in their intent, even when the specific numbers differ. Typical requirements include a 6- to 10-foot landscape buffer paired with a 6- to 8-foot opacity screen made up of a wall or evergreen plantings, and heavy industrial uses located near residential zones often face buffers of 100 feet or more with substantial screening. Municipal codes also commonly require that loading docks, truck berths, refuse handling areas, and ground-level mechanical equipment be screened wherever they’re visible from a public right-of-way, and many ordinances extend that requirement to service structures over roughly 30 feet high, meaning rooftop equipment can trigger its own screening obligation depending on the jurisdiction.
An underdesigned planting plan gets these numbers technically right and still creates two downstream problems. The first shows up at plan review: reviewers who process industrial submittals every week recognize a plan assembled purely to hit minimums, and borderline compliance is exactly what generates review comments and resubmittal cycles. The second problem shows up after the certificate of occupancy. Screening material chosen without regard for mature size, growth rate, or maintenance access ends up thin, dead, or removed within a few years, and code enforcement doesn’t care why the screening failed, only that it no longer meets the requirement.
That’s the practical case for bringing a landscape architect into an industrial project early rather than treating the planting plan as a permit formality. The same code-required tree count and buffer width can either barely clear review, or actively solve problems the developer already has: equipment noise, glare, dust, security sightlines, and pavement heat
The Industrial Project Types We Design For, and What Each One Actually Needs
“Industrial” covers several distinct building types, and each one drives a different landscape and irrigation program.
Data Centers
Security and equipment screening dominate the program on a data center site. Generator yards, chiller plants, and cooling equipment need screening that satisfies the jurisdiction without opening gaps in the site’s security perimeter. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles generally call for lower shrub massing near fences and camera lines, with taller canopy set further back, which sometimes runs counter to a reviewer’s instinct to simply add more plant material at the buffer. Because these sites often run with minimal on-site staff, the planting palette leans toward low-maintenance, regionally adapted species that don’t generate frequent pruning or replacement calls. For developers building out a multi-site data center program, irrigation zoning also needs to be simple enough for a remote facilities team to manage through a smart controller, which is the kind of standardization our program management services are built around.
Warehouse and Distribution Centers
The truck court and the parking field define this building type, and both drive landscape requirements. Parking lot shading formulas, typically expressed as a tree per fixed number of stalls, or a percentage of paved area under canopy at maturity, apply at full scale here because these sites often carry hundreds of employee and trailer parking spaces. Loading dock and trailer storage areas usually need street-facing screening, and stormwater detention basins, common on large-footprint distribution sites, need a planting approach that tolerates periodic inundation without looking like an afterthought retention pond.
Cold Storage Facilities
Refrigeration equipment adds a constraint most other industrial types don’t have. Condenser units and refrigeration package units require clear airflow, so planting can’t crowd equipment pads even where a screening requirement technically applies to that area. Designing for cold storage means satisfying code from the public-facing sides of the site while keeping manufacturer-specified clearances open around heat rejection equipment, usually by shifting screening plant material a few feet further from the equipment pad than the buffer minimum would otherwise require, and by specifying taller, narrower plant forms instead of wide-spreading shrubs.
Self-Storage Facilities
Self-storage is the outlier in this group because it’s the one industrial-adjacent use with regular walk-in customers, which makes curb appeal a leasing variable and not just a compliance one. The office and entry drive typically get an enhanced planting palette, while the long, low-traffic drive aisles between unit buildings are designed around minimum-maintenance groundcover and turf alternatives, since most self-storage operators run lean landscape maintenance budgets across a portfolio of unstaffed or lightly staffed sites.
Code Compliance Is the Floor, Not the Ceiling
A planting plan that satisfies a jurisdiction’s ordinance and a planting plan that solves the developer’s actual site problems can use the identical tree count, shrub count, and buffer width. What separates them is placement and species selection.
Evergreen versus deciduous species selection determines whether a screen works twelve months a year or only during the growing season. A buffer required to screen a generator yard from an adjacent office park loses most of its function every winter if it’s planted entirely in deciduous material. Columnar or fastigiate tree forms let a narrow bufferyard hit an opacity requirement without pushing root systems and canopy spread into a drive aisle or utility easement. Parking lot shade trees have to be sized and spaced to meet the jurisdiction’s shading formula at a defined number of years after installation, not on the day they’re planted, so species selection has to account for growth rate as much as mature size.
Placement decisions matter just as much as species selection. A tree planted against the reflected heat and wind funneling off a 40-foot metal building wall faces a different microclimate than the same species planted at a shaded, wind-protected corner of the same site, and a plan that ignores that difference produces uneven establishment and higher warranty replacement rates. None of this shows up as a line item on a code compliance checklist, but it’s the difference between a screening buffer that still functions in year eight and one that has to be re-planted at the developer’s expense.
Coordination with the civil grading and drainage plan matters here too. Root zones need to be checked against underground utility routing, storm drain laterals, and dry utility trenching before a planting plan is finalized, and on multi-phase distribution or data center campuses, the plan has to account for what’s installed in phase one versus what waits for a later phase, so early screening doesn’t get torn out when the next phase of grading starts.
Irrigation Design as a Water-Conservation and Risk-Management Tool
Irrigation on industrial sites gets treated as a commodity scope item more often than any other part of the landscape package, which is a mistake given how much irrigated area a typical warehouse, data center, or self-storage site carries once parking lot islands, perimeter buffers, and detention basin slopes are added up.
Hydrozoning, grouping plant material into irrigation zones based on water need rather than location alone, is the foundation of an efficient system. A buffer planted in drought-tolerant, regionally adapted species and a parking lot island planted in ornamental turf shouldn’t run on the same zone or schedule, and mixing them is one of the most common sources of overwatering on commercial sites. Weather-based and soil-moisture-based smart controllers, the technology behind the EPA WaterSense label, correct for this automatically once zones are set up correctly. Experts estimate that as much as half of landscape irrigation water is wasted due to overwatering caused by inefficiencies in irrigation methods and systems, which is where a properly engineered system starts to pay for itself.
The scale matters for industrial sites specifically. Case studies on commercial landscapes have found average water savings of around 30 percent from advanced irrigation controllers, and one documented case at a roughly 370,000-square-foot commercial office complex in Texas found a 40 percent reduction in irrigation water use in its first year, saving more than 12 million gallons of water and roughly $47,000, with a payback period of about a year and a half. A large-footprint industrial site carries a comparable irrigated area once buffers, parking lot landscaping, and detention basin plantings are totaled, so the same efficiency gains, and the same payback logic, apply directly to warehouse and distribution projects of similar scale.
There’s a risk-management dimension here too, specific to how industrial assets get operated. Most industrial properties run with lean on-site staff, and many, particularly data centers and self-storage facilities, have no dedicated grounds crew at all. An irrigation system engineered around correct hydrozoning and a smart controller can run largely unattended and still keep screening plants alive. An irrigation system designed as an afterthought, with zones that don’t match plant water needs, tends to either overwater, driving up utility costs and stressing plant material through root rot and fungal issues, or underwater, killing the screening plantings a code inspector checks for at renewal or during a complaint-driven review. Either failure mode becomes the property manager’s problem long after the design team has moved on. According to ASLA, water-efficient irrigation is most effective when it’s part of an integrated site design from the start, not a fixture spec added at the end, which is exactly why irrigation deserves the same engineering attention as the planting plan itself.
Industrial Project Types at a Glance
For asset managers and CFOs evaluating the timing of an AB 1572 retrofit program, the financial calculus favors early action over deadline-driven compression — for several reasons.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do data centers and warehouses actually need a landscape architect, or is a basic planting plan enough?
Most jurisdictions require a licensed landscape architect’s stamp for the planting plan on any industrial site plan submittal, so the licensure question is usually settled by code before the design question comes up. Beyond the stamp requirement, a landscape architect coordinates the planting plan with civil grading, drainage, and utility routing, which reduces the review comments and resubmittal cycles that come with plans assembled without that coordination.
How much of an industrial site's overall budget typically goes toward landscape and irrigation design?
It’s a small percentage of total project cost on most industrial sites, usually well under what’s spent on retail or multifamily landscape packages, since most of the parcel is building, paving, and vehicle circulation rather than planted area. That’s exactly why the decisions within that smaller scope carry more weight: there’s less room to absorb a screening buffer that fails or an irrigation system that overwaters, because there’s less landscape area to begin with.
Can screening plantings interfere with cold storage refrigeration equipment or generator clearances?
Yes, and it’s one of the more common coordination issues on cold storage and data center sites. Refrigeration condensers, chillers, and backup generators require manufacturer-specified airflow clearances, and a screening buffer planted at the ordinance minimum distance can crowd that equipment. The usual fix is shifting plant material further from the equipment pad than the buffer minimum requires and specifying narrower, upright plant forms instead of wide-spreading shrubs.
What's the difference between a code-compliant planting plan and an enhanced one?
A code-compliant, or “permit,” planting plan is engineered to satisfy the jurisdiction’s minimum tree ratios, buffer widths, and screening opacity requirements and nothing more. An enhanced plan starts from that same compliance baseline but layers in species and placement decisions that address the developer’s actual site conditions, including equipment noise, glare, pavement heat, security sightlines, and leasing curb appeal, often using the same or a comparable plant count and budget.
How does irrigation design affect long-term operating costs for industrial property owners?
Irrigation zones that don’t match plant water needs tend to run in one of two costly directions: overwatering, which raises utility bills and stresses plant material, or underwatering, which kills the screening and buffer plantings a code inspector checks for during a complaint-driven review or permit renewal. A properly hydrozoned system with a smart controller avoids both failure modes and is built to run without a dedicated on-site grounds crew, which matters given how leanly most industrial properties are staffed.
Do landscape architects coordinate directly with civil engineers on industrial site plans?
Yes, and on industrial projects that coordination has to happen early. Grading, drainage, detention basin design, and utility routing all interact directly with where plant material and irrigation lines can go, so the planting and irrigation plans need to be developed alongside the civil package rather than dropped in after grading is finalized.
Partner with a Landscape Architecture Team That Understands Industrial Development
Evergreen Design Group has designed planting and irrigation plans for data center, warehouse, distribution, cold storage, and self-storage projects since 2005, working in-house and as a subconsultant to civil engineers, architects, and design-build contractors licensed in more than 40 states. If you’re scoping an industrial project and want a planting and irrigation package built for jurisdictional review and long-term operational performance, connect with our team to talk through your site.
Get in Touch with Us
Ensure your compliance with CA AB 1572 now, before the deadline approaches.
Related Posts
Author: Rodney McNabb
Evergreen Design Group, a landscape architectural firm, was formed in 2005 by Rodney McNabb. After serving seven years in the U.S. Marine Corps, Rodney entered the landscape contracting business in 1992. Beginning his career as a landscape chemical applicator, Rodney’s employer quickly realized that Rodney was in the wrong position when he kept unintentionally killing all the grass he was spraying for weeds. While this was a commercial landscape maintenance business, Rodney was quickly re-routed to fill the company’s first sales and estimator position for landscape construction projects. This is where Rodney began to excel. After a few short years, he was promoted to oversee the operations of the different branch offices of this company. He even went to work for another firm where he was a regional manager overseeing multiple offices in multiple states that focused on the exterior and interior landscape maintenance of shopping malls. Rodney eventually formed his full-service landscape company – focusing on design, installation, and maintenance. While enjoying the contractor world, he enjoyed the design side more and created Evergreen Design Group to focus strictly on landscape design and consulting. Evergreen Design Group grew quickly and efficiently. The firm now employs approximately 15 landscape architects, landscape designers, and irrigation designers – and focuses on projects all over the U.S. View all posts by Rodney McNabb
Low-Water-Use Landscape Ordinances in Phoenix, Scottsdale, Tucson, and Mesa: A Developer's Comparison
Landscape Architects for Senior Living Facilities: Amenities & Selection